PARP-1, Cell Signaling Technology, 9532
What do reviewers generally think about 9532 from Cell Signaling Technology?
Researchers generally view this antibody as effective for detecting endogenous human PARP-1 by Western blotting and immunofluorescence, with KO validation showing specific ~120 kDa WT bands and no IF signal in PARP1 KO cells. One reviewer points out that WB at 1:1000 produced faint smears in PARP1 KO lanes, so IF was rated five stars while WB was rated four stars. Additional testing found IP detected a band but did not completely deplete antigen, and IF showed stronger WT staining with diffuse staining also reported.
Information about this antibody
Vendor notes
User Reviews (2)
Review of: PARP-1, Cell Signaling Technology, 9532 by pAbmAbs Data Mining
Our team has carried out deep research in the published scientific literature to identify papers and reports using antibodies directed against human Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and followed up by extraction and evaluation of the available data to assess its performance according to pAbmAbs rating criteria.
YCharOS is here conducting a large head-to-head study comparing 25 commercial research antibodies against human Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1).
The collection of antibodies was tested using HAP1 WT and PARP1 KO cells in the applications WB (WT and KO cell lysates/30 µg protein), IP (WT cell lysate), IF (WT and KO cells) and flow cytometry (KO and WT cells) according to YCharOS standard protocols (see reference). This antibody was also tested in HEK293T WT and KO in the application WB.
In WB (1:1000 ab dilution) 9532 detected a band of appr. 120 kDa in WT cell lysate with no corresponding band observed in KO cell lysate. This pattern was consistent in both cell lines. A band was detected following IP (2 µg Ab used), this band was more intense compared to band in input extract (6% of starting material). A band was also detected in immunodepleted extract (6% of total unbound fraction), showing that the antibody does not completely deplete the antigen from cell lysate. In IF (1:200 ab dilution), a more intense staining was observed in WT cells whereas diffuse staining was observed in KO cells. Flow cytometry using 9532 (1:4380 ab dilution) showed a clear right-shift in WT cells relative to KO cells. KO cells also right shifted and some overlap between the two populations were observed.
Comments